In this new study, researchers investigated an artificial intelligence (AI) tool that produces attenuation-corrected PET images while reducing radiation exposure for patients.
—
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) combined with Computed Tomography (CT) is a powerful imaging modality used in oncology for diagnosis, staging, and treatment monitoring. However, one limitation of PET/CT is the need for accurate attenuation correction (AC) to account for tissue density variations. Traditionally, low-dose CT scans are used for AC, but these contribute to patient radiation exposure.
In a new study, researchers Kevin C. Ma, Esther Mena, Liza Lindenberg, Nathan S. Lay, Phillip Eclarinal, Deborah E. Citrin, Peter A. Pinto, Bradford J. Wood, William L. Dahut, James L. Gulley, Ravi A. Madan, Peter L. Choyke, Ismail Baris Turkbey, and Stephanie A. Harmon from the National Cancer Institute proposed an artificial intelligence (AI) tool to generate attenuation-corrected PET (AC-PET) images directly from non-attenuation-corrected PET (NAC-PET) images, reducing the reliance on CT scans. Their research paper was published in Oncotarget’s Volume 15 on May 7, 2024, entitled, “Deep learning-based whole-body PSMA PET/CT attenuation correction utilizing Pix-2-Pix GAN.”
“Sequential PET/CT studies oncology patients can undergo during their treatment follow-up course is limited by radiation dosage. We propose an artificial intelligence (AI) tool to produce attenuation-corrected PET (AC-PET) images from non-attenuation-corrected PET (NAC-PET) images to reduce need for low-dose CT scans.”
The Study
The researchers developed a deep learning algorithm based on a 2D Pix-2-Pix generative adversarial network (GAN) architecture. They used paired AC-PET and NAC-PET images from 302 prostate cancer patients. The dataset was split into training, validation, and testing cohorts (183, 60, and 59 studies, respectively). Two normalization strategies were employed: Standard Uptake Value (SUV)-based and SUV-Nyul-based. The AI model learned to generate AC-PET images from NAC-PET images, effectively bypassing the need for CT scans during PET/CT studies. The performance of the AI model was evaluated at the scan level using several metrics:
Normalized Mean Square Error (NMSE): A measure of the difference between predicted and ground truth AC-PET images. Lower NMSE indicates better performance.
Mean Absolute Error (MAE): Similar to NMSE, lower MAE signifies improved accuracy.
Structural Similarity Index (SSIM): Measures image similarity. Higher SSIM values indicate better alignment between AC-PET and ground truth images.
Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR): Evaluates image quality. Higher PSNR values correspond to better image fidelity.
The AI model demonstrated promising results, achieving competitive performance across all metrics. The choice of normalization strategy (SUV-based or SUV-Nyul-based) did not significantly impact the model’s effectiveness.
The proposed AI tool has several clinical implications. By eliminating the need for low-dose CT scans, patients are exposed to less ionizing radiation during PET/CT studies. Additionally AC-PET images can be generated directly from NAC-PET data, simplifying the imaging process. The AI model also produces accurate AC-PET images, enhancing diagnostic confidence.
Conclusions
Deep learning-based AC-PET image generation using Pix-2-Pix GANs represents a promising approach to improve PET/CT imaging in prostate cancer patients. As AI continues to evolve, its integration into clinical practice may revolutionize how we acquire and interpret medical images, ultimately benefiting patient care. In summary, this research contributes to the ongoing efforts to enhance imaging techniques, reduce patient radiation exposure, and streamline clinical workflows.
“The Pix-2-Pix GAN model for generating AC-PET demonstrates SUV metrics that highly correlate with original images. AI-generated PET images show clinical potential for reducing the need for CT scans for attenuation correction while preserving quantitative markers and image quality.”
Click here to read the full research paper in Oncotarget.
—
Oncotarget is an open-access, peer-reviewed journal that has published primarily oncology-focused research papers since 2010. These papers are available to readers (at no cost and free of subscription barriers) in a continuous publishing format at Oncotarget.com.
Oncotarget is indexed and archived by PubMed/Medline, PubMed Central, Scopus, EMBASE, META (Chan Zuckerberg Initiative) (2018-2022), and Dimensions (Digital Science).
Click here to subscribe to Oncotarget publication updates.
In this new study, researchers assessed the feasibility of treating HR+/HER2-negative breast cancer patients with the immunotherapies durvalumab and tremelimumab before standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery.
—
Breast cancer immunotherapy has shown promise, but its clinical efficacy remains limited, especially for hormone receptor positive (HR+)/HER2-negative breast cancer. While immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy have benefitted some early-stage and metastatic triple-negative breast cancer patients, HR+/HER2-negative cases have seen fewer improvements.
Recent neoadjuvant trials indicate that early-stage HR+/HER2-negative breast cancers might respond better to immunotherapy strategies that amplify tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) through dual PD-(L)1/CTLA-4 checkpoint inhibition before surgery and chemotherapy. This approach could enhance the immune response in the tumor microenvironment and improve outcomes for this challenging breast cancer subtype.
The Study
Increased TILs are associated with improved neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) responses across breast cancer subtypes. Recently, researchers Haven R. Garber, Sreyashi Basu, Sonali Jindal, Zhong He, Khoi Chu, Akshara Singareeka Raghavendra, Clinton Yam, Lumarie Santiago, Beatriz E. Adrada, Padmanee Sharma, Elizabeth A. Mittendorf, and Jennifer K. Litton from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, and Harvard Medical School hypothesized that amplifying TILs via dual checkpoint blockade would enhance the response to subsequent NACT in breast tumors.
“This feasibility study was conducted to begin testing the hypothesis that dual checkpoint blockade would increase TIL and enhance the response to subsequent NACT in patients with stage II or III HR+/HER2-negative breast cancer.”
Patient Screening, Recruitment, & Assessment
The study aimed to accrue 16 patients to evaluate the feasibility of enrolling patients with clinical stage II or III HR+/HER2-negative breast cancer onto a trial evaluating investigational immunotherapy agents before standard NACT. Patient tumor samples were collected to assess immunologic and molecular responses to combination checkpoint blockade.
Eligible patients had to have HR+/HER2-negative breast cancer, defined as estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR) expression >10% by immunohistochemistry (IHC), and HER2-negative defined as 0/1+ by IHC or if 2+, negative by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Other inclusion criteria included an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, planned NACT, and adequate blood counts and organ function.
Patients were excluded if they had received prior PD-1, PD-L1, or CTLA-4 inhibitors or any prior treatment for the primary breast cancer. Other exclusions included current or prior use of immunosuppressive medications within 28 days, active or previous autoimmune disease within 2 years, inflammatory bowel disease, or receipt of a live attenuated vaccination within 30 days before study entry or treatment.
Durvalumab was administered at 1500 mg IV, and tremelimumab at 75 mg IV for 2 cycles on days 1 and 28. Patients then proceeded to standard NACT followed by breast surgery. Baseline breast ultrasounds were performed within 21 days before the first immunotherapy cycle and again between 1 and 7 days after the second cycle. Research biopsies were collected at baseline and after 2 cycles of immunotherapy.
Results & Discussion
The trial’s target accrual of 16 patients was not met, as it was stopped early after three of the first eight enrolled patients experienced immunotherapy-related toxicity or suspected disease progression, indicating that this strategy is not clinically feasible.
Among the eight patients who did receive the study-specified combination immunotherapy, seven had pre- and post-immunotherapy ultrasounds performed, showing mixed responses. Three experienced an increase in tumor volume, three a decrease, and one showed stable disease. The impact of combination immunotherapy on TILs was also mixed. Though limited by the number of patients with available serial biopsies, there did not appear to be a significant increase in the immune response within the tumor microenvironment (TME).
The Phase II NIMBUS trial also assessed dual checkpoint blockade in breast cancer, though in a population of metastatic breast cancer patients with tumors harboring a high tumor mutation burden (TMB ≥9 mutations per megabase). Of the 30 patients enrolled, 20 had ER+/HER2-negative breast cancer. The overall response rate (ORR) was 16.7%, with four durable responses lasting at least 15 months. Three of the five responders had a TMB ≥14 mutations per megabase. The ORR among patients with TMB <14 mutations per megabase was 6.7%. Three patients (10%) experienced grade 3 immune toxicity.
The TAPUR basket trial similarly included patients with TMB-high metastatic breast cancer but utilized single-agent anti-PD-1 checkpoint blockade (pembrolizumab) rather than combination immunotherapy. Half of the 28 enrolled patients had ER+ breast cancer, and the majority had received multiple prior lines of systemic therapy. The ORR was 21% with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 10.6 weeks. Five patients (17.9%) experienced one or more grade 3 adverse events possibly attributed to pembrolizumab, and six patients discontinued treatment due to side effects.
In summary, while a minority of patients with ER+ metastatic breast cancer may benefit from anti-PD-(L)1/anti-CTLA-4 checkpoint blockade, the majority risk exposure to immune-related adverse events without additional benefit.
Conclusion & Future Directions
The present study did not demonstrate a clear benefit for dual checkpoint blockade administered prior to NACT in patients with stage II or III HR+/HER2-negative breast cancer. Only one out of eight patients (12.5%) achieved a pathologic complete response (pCR) at the time of breast surgery after immune therapy and NACT. Two patients experienced grade 3 immunotherapy-related toxicity.
While the KEYNOTE-756 and CheckMate 7FL trials have demonstrated improved pCR rates with the addition of single-agent anti-PD-1 checkpoint blockade to NACT for patients with high-risk HR+/HER2-negative, stage II/III breast cancer, the risk/benefit calculus of adding immunotherapy for this subtype is different from metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) or even stage II/III TNBC, where the risks of morbidity and mortality from disease are higher.
Hopefully, biomarkers such as PD-L1 expression and tumor mutation burden (TMB) will guide the use of single or dual-agent immunotherapy towards those patients most likely to benefit, sparing others from significant toxicity. Notably, immune-mediated adverse events of grade 3 or higher were reported in 12.9% of breast cancer patients receiving pembrolizumab in the KEYNOTE-522 trial and in 38% of patients receiving dual ipilimumab/nivolumab in a trial of patients with metastatic melanoma.
For immunotherapy to play a meaningful role in HR+/HER2-negative early breast cancer, a breast cancer subtype where most patients are cured with standard therapy, it will need to significantly increase the fraction of cured patients without disproportionately causing serious and/or long-term immune toxicity. Future research should focus on identifying predictive biomarkers and optimizing combination strategies to enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy in this challenging breast cancer subtype.
Click here to read the full research paper in Oncotarget.
—
Oncotarget is an open-access, peer-reviewed journal that has published primarily oncology-focused research papers since 2010. These papers are available to readers (at no cost and free of subscription barriers) in a continuous publishing format at Oncotarget.com.
Oncotarget is indexed and archived by PubMed/Medline, PubMed Central, Scopus, EMBASE, META (Chan Zuckerberg Initiative) (2018-2022), and Dimensions (Digital Science).
Click here to subscribe to Oncotarget publication updates.
This article dissects Dr. Mikhail V. Blagosklonny’s paradigm-shifting perspective on preemptive combinations for treating EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer.
—
In the relentless battle against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) driven by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, the development of resistance has long been a formidable obstacle. Historically, first- and second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) like gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, and dacomitinib have faced a significant hurdle: the emergence of the T790M point mutation in approximately 50% of patients, rendering the tumor resistant to these therapies.
This resistance stems from a sobering reality – before treatment, a small subset of cancer cells already harbor the T790M mutation, conferring no selective advantage initially. However, once treatment commences, these rare mutated cells proliferate selectively, eventually dominating the tumor population and diminishing the effectiveness of first- and second-generation TKIs.
The Rise of Osimertinib: A Beacon of Hope
In 2015, the FDA approved osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR TKI, as a second-line therapy for NSCLC patients with the T790M mutation. This approval recognized that untreated tumors are typically T790M-negative, with the mutation potentially present in only a single cell initially. Moreover, approximately 50% of patients do not harbor this mutation at all, underscoring the rationale for administering osimertinib after resistance to first- or second-generation TKIs emerges.
However, a paradigm shift was on the horizon. Osimertinib’s ability to target the T790M mutation, coupled with its potential to eliminate the rare resistant cells before they proliferate, paved the way for a groundbreaking approach: administering osimertinib as a first-line treatment, without waiting for resistance to develop.
Preemptive Combinations: A Multifaceted Strategy
In a seminal 2018 clinical trial, osimertinib demonstrated its prowess as a first-line treatment, significantly extending median progression-free survival (PFS) compared to first-generation EGFR inhibitors (18.9 months vs. 10.2 months). Remarkably, while the objective response rates were similar between the two groups, the duration of response was nearly doubled with osimertinib (17.2 months vs. 8.5 months).
Capitalizing on these findings, Dr. Mikhail V. Blagosklonny introduced the concept of “preemptive combinations” – a multi-pronged approach to not only induce a therapeutic response but also eliminate the few resistant cells harboring pre-existing mutations. By combining osimertinib with first- or second-generation EGFR inhibitors like gefitinib and afatinib, these preemptive combinations could potentially prevent on-target resistance mechanisms, thereby extending PFS and overall survival (OS) for a substantial proportion of patients. On March 15, 2024, Dr. Blagosklonny’s research perspective was published in Oncotarget’s Volume 15, entitled, “From osimertinib to preemptive combinations.”
Expanding the Armamentarium: Comprehensive Preemptive Combinations
While osimertinib addresses the T790M mutation, other resistance mechanisms remain a concern. Approximately 50% of resistance cases involve on-target secondary mutations within EGFR, such as L718, G724, L792, G796, and C797, which can be targeted by first- or second-generation EGFR inhibitors. Additionally, off-target mechanisms like MET and HER2 amplifications contribute to resistance.
To combat this multifaceted challenge, Dr. Blagosklonny proposed a comprehensive preemptive combination comprising osimertinib, afatinib (or a first-generation EGFR inhibitor), and capmatinib (a potent MET inhibitor). This triple-threat approach could potentially prevent up to 75% of resistance mechanisms, dramatically extending median PFS from 18 months with osimertinib alone to an estimated 40 months.
Addressing Heterogeneity: The Bittersweet Reality
While osimertinib undoubtedly improves median PFS and OS compared to first-generation TKIs, a sobering reality emerges: approximately 20% of patients may experience a shortened PFS due to pre-existing mutations like C797S, which render the tumor resistant to osimertinib but sensitive to first-generation TKIs. In these cases, osimertinib inadvertently selects for resistant clones, potentially harming a subset of patients.
The solution, as proposed by Dr. Blagosklonny, lies in the simplicity of preemptive combinations. By combining osimertinib with gefitinib, or even a triple combination with afatinib, the risk of selecting for resistant clones is mitigated, ensuring that no patient is inadvertently harmed by the superior TKI.
Transient Combinations: A Flexible Approach
For clinicians who may be hesitant about administering three- or four-drug combinations, Dr. Blagosklonny suggests a flexible approach: a sequence of transient two-drug combinations. This strategy involves alternating between different combinations, such as osimertinib and gefitinib, followed by osimertinib and afatinib, and so on, effectively covering all potential resistance mechanisms while maintaining a manageable treatment regimen.
Extending the Paradigm: MET-Driven NSCLC
The insights gleaned from EGFR-driven NSCLC can be applied to other molecular subtypes, such as MET exon 14 skipping mutation (METex14)-driven NSCLC. Dr. Blagosklonny’s personal experience with this condition underscores the importance of preemptive combinations in this setting as well.
While the selective MET inhibitor capmatinib demonstrated remarkable efficacy in treating Dr. Blagosklonny’s brain metastases, resistance tends to emerge within a year, often driven by secondary mutations like D1228 and Y1230. To combat this, a preemptive combination of capmatinib, afatinib (to target EGFR and HER2 alterations), and cabozantinib (a type II MET inhibitor effective against resistance mutations) could potentially prevent up to 50% of resistance mechanisms, prolonging progression-free survival for a significant proportion of METex14-driven NSCLC patients.
Overcoming Hurdles: The Path Forward
Despite the promise of preemptive combinations, challenges remain. The development of novel targeted therapies and the exploration of immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with these regimens offer exciting avenues for future research. Additionally, refining clinical trial designs to incorporate precision medicine approaches and tailored combination strategies will be crucial in translating these concepts into tangible benefits for patients.
Conclusion: A Paradigm Shift in Cancer Care
Dr. Blagosklonny’s perspective on preemptive combinations represents a paradigm shift in the treatment of lung cancer and potentially other malignancies. By proactively targeting resistance mechanisms before they can take hold, this approach offers a glimmer of hope for prolonging progression-free survival and improving outcomes for patients grappling with this disease. As research continues to unravel the complexities of cancer resistance, preemptive combinations may pave the way for a future where we can stay one step ahead of cancer.
Click here to read the full research perspective in Oncotarget.
—
Oncotarget is an open-access, peer-reviewed journal that publishes primarily oncology-focused research papers. These papers are available to readers (at no cost and free of subscription barriers) in an open-access and continuous publishing format at Oncotarget.com.
Oncotarget is indexed and archived by PubMed/Medline, PubMed Central, Scopus, EMBASE, META (Chan Zuckerberg Initiative) (2018-2022), and Dimensions (Digital Science).
Click here to subscribe to Oncotarget publication updates.
In this new study, researchers examined the impact of MIA-602 as monotherapy and in combination with Doxorubicin on three Doxorubicin-resistant acute myeloid leukemia cell lines.
—
Upon diagnosing acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the initial step involves assessing a patient’s eligibility for intensive chemotherapy. The standard treatment protocol for newly diagnosed AML encompasses intensive chemotherapy to achieve complete remission, followed by post-remission therapy, which may include additional chemotherapy and/or stem cell transplantation. Complete response rates to this approach range from 60% to 85% in adults aged 60 or younger.
While this approach has proven effective, the risk of relapse within three years of diagnosis remains a significant concern. Numerous factors contribute to the likelihood of relapse, including short duration of remission, genetic derangements, prior allogeneic transplantation, advanced age, and concomitant comorbidities. These negative prognostic factors underscore the need for continuous exploration of novel therapeutic agents, as relapse remains a formidable barrier to treatment success.
Drug resistance poses a substantial challenge in the treatment of AML, often hindering successful outcomes. This resistance can manifest in two distinct forms:
Primary Drug Resistance: Inherent resistance to specific therapeutic agents, present from the outset of treatment.
Acquired Drug Resistance: Resistance developed over the course of treatment, potentially due to various underlying mechanisms.
These resistance pathways involve intricate interplay between drug resistance-related proteins, enzymes, genes, microRNAs, and aberrant signaling pathways, highlighting the complexity of this phenomenon.
Exploring the Potential of GHRH Antagonists in AML Treatment
Growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) is a neuropeptide hormone primarily released by the hypothalamus, canonically known for its role in inducing the release of growth hormone from the pituitary gland. However, GHRH’s influence extends beyond this endocrine axis, acting as a growth factor in various cancer types and normal tissues through an autocrine/paracrine mechanism.
Previous studies have demonstrated the expression of GHRH receptors (GHRH-R) in human AML cell lines, including K-562, THP-1, and KG-1A. Notably, the GHRH antagonist MIA-602 has exhibited the ability to inhibit the proliferation of these leukemic cells both in vitro and in preclinical mouse models.
MIA-602, a synthetic GHRH antagonist, has garnered significant attention for its potential in circumventing drug resistance and mitigating the adverse effects associated with conventional chemotherapy. Numerous studies have documented the anti-oncogenic mechanisms of GHRH antagonists, which encompass:
-Downregulation of NF-κB and beta-catenin
-Upregulation of caveolin-1 and E-cadherin
-Activation of pro-apoptotic pathways
-Modulation of inflammatory cytokines
-Inhibition of the Akt signaling pathway
These diverse mechanisms underscore the multifaceted approach through which MIA-602 exerts its anti-cancer effects, targeting various aspects of oncogenesis, including cellular proliferation, survival, and motility. Importantly, GHRH antagonists have been implicated in the in vitro inhibition of a wide range of cancer cell lines, spanning from acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) and AML to estrogen-independent breast cancer, clear cell ovarian cancer, glioblastoma, gastric cancer, prostate cancer, and endometrial adenocarcinoma.
Investigating the Impact of MIA-602 on Doxorubicin-Resistant AML Cell Lines
In Vitro Evaluation: Unveiling Promising Results
In the current study, Gaumond et al. evaluated the impact of MIA-602 as a monotherapy and in combination with the chemotherapeutic agent Doxorubicin on three Doxorubicin-resistant AML cell lines: KG-1A, U-937, and K-562. The in vitro results revealed a remarkable reduction in cell viability across all treated wild-type cells, underscoring the efficacy of MIA-602.
Notably, the Doxorubicin-resistant clones exhibited a comparable susceptibility to MIA-602 as their wild-type counterparts. This finding suggests that MIA-602’s mechanism of action is distinct from that of Doxorubicin, enabling it to circumvent the resistance pathways that render Doxorubicin ineffective.
When treated with MIA-602 alone, the following decreases in cell viability were observed:
-KG-1A: 53.5% (wild-type) and 54.5% (Doxorubicin-resistant)
-U-937: 49% (wild-type) and 51.25% (Doxorubicin-resistant)
-K-562: 79.25% (both wild-type and Doxorubicin-resistant)
These results highlight the potent anti-proliferative effects of MIA-602 on AML cell lines, irrespective of their Doxorubicin resistance status. Furthermore, the combination treatment of Doxorubicin and MIA-602 yielded even more remarkable outcomes:
-KG-1A: 80.25% decrease in wild-type cell viability and 57.5% reduction in Doxorubicin-resistant cells
-U-937: 92.5% decrease in wild-type cells and 52.75% reduction in Doxorubicin-resistant cells
-K-562: 88.75% reduction in wild-type cell viability and 78.25% decrease in Doxorubicin-resistant cells
These findings suggest a potential synergistic effect between MIA-602 and Doxorubicin, highlighting the therapeutic potential of this combination approach in overcoming drug resistance.
In Vivo Validation: Corroborating the Therapeutic Efficacy
To further substantiate the in vitro observations, an in vivo experiment was conducted using nude mice xenografted with Doxorubicin-resistant K-562 cells. The mice were randomly divided into two groups: one receiving a control diluent and the other treated with MIA-602 at a dose of 10 μg twice daily for 28 days.
After the treatment period, the control group exhibited a tumor volume of 1114 mm³, while the MIA-602 monotherapy group demonstrated a significantly reduced tumor volume of 629 mm³ – a remarkable decrease of 485 mm³. This finding further reinforces the therapeutic potential of MIA-602 in combating Doxorubicin-resistant AML.
Exploring the Mechanisms of Action and Future Directions
While the anti-oncogenic mechanisms of GHRH antagonists have been extensively studied in various cancer types, further investigation is warranted to elucidate the specific transcriptional effects of GHRH antagonism in Doxorubicin-resistant AML cell lines. Understanding these molecular pathways could pave the way for more targeted and effective therapeutic strategies.
Another area of interest lies in exploring the potential influence of genetic AML subtypes on the response to GHRH antagonist therapy. By examining the expression levels of GHRH receptors across different AML subtypes, researchers can gain insights into the therapeutic potential of MIA-602 and its potential for personalized treatment approaches.
The observed synergistic effects of MIA-602 and Doxorubicin in combating Doxorubicin-resistant AML cell lines warrant further exploration of combination therapies. By strategically combining MIA-602 with other chemotherapeutic agents or targeted therapies, researchers may uncover novel treatment regimens with enhanced efficacy and reduced adverse effects.
Ultimately, the successful translation of these preclinical findings to clinical settings will be crucial in realizing the full potential of MIA-602 as a therapeutic option for Doxorubicin-resistant AML. Well-designed clinical trials will be essential to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and optimal dosing regimens of MIA-602, both as a monotherapy and in combination with other treatments.
Conclusion: Paving the Way for Improved Outcomes
The discovery of MIA-602’s ability to overcome Doxorubicin resistance in acute myeloid leukemia represents a significant step forward in the quest for more effective and targeted therapies. By leveraging the unique mechanisms of action of GHRH antagonists, researchers have unveiled a promising therapeutic approach that circumvents the limitations of conventional chemotherapy.
While further research is necessary to fully elucidate the underlying molecular pathways and optimize treatment strategies, the findings presented in this study offer hope for improved outcomes in patients with Doxorubicin-resistant AML. By continuing to explore the potential of novel agents like MIA-602, the scientific community moves closer to achieving the ultimate goal of personalized, effective, and well-tolerated treatments for this challenging malignancy.
Click here to read the full research paper in Oncotarget.
—
Oncotarget is an open-access, peer-reviewed journal that has published primarily oncology-focused research papers since 2010. These papers are available to readers (at no cost and free of subscription barriers) in a continuous publishing format at Oncotarget.com.
Oncotarget is indexed and archived by PubMed/Medline, PubMed Central, Scopus, EMBASE, META (Chan Zuckerberg Initiative) (2018-2022), and Dimensions (Digital Science).
Click here to subscribe to Oncotarget publication updates.
In this new study, researchers investigated the interplay between the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and tumor suppressor gene p53.
—
The profound impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, has been felt across various domains, including the realm of cancer research and treatment. As scientists delve deeper into the intricate mechanisms of this viral pathogen, intriguing revelations have emerged regarding its potential influence on cellular processes pivotal to cancer development and progression.
In this study, researchers El-Deiry and Zhang uncovered a hitherto unknown facet of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein’s impact on cancer cells. Their findings, meticulously detailed in their research paper, have ignited a newfound curiosity within the scientific community.
To appreciate the significance of this discovery, one must first comprehend the critical function of the p53 protein, often referred to as the “guardian of the genome.” This multifaceted tumor suppressor plays a pivotal role in safeguarding cellular integrity by regulating various processes, including cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, and apoptosis (programmed cell death). When cells encounter stress or DNA damage, p53 is activated, triggering a cascade of events aimed at preserving genomic stability or eliminating compromised cells.
The study has unveiled a remarkable phenomenon: the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein appears to disrupt the intricate balance of the p53 pathway, potentially compromising its tumor-suppressive capabilities. Through a series of meticulously designed experiments, the researchers demonstrated that the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in cancer cells interferes with the binding of p53 to its negative regulator, MDM2.
This disruption, in turn, impedes the activation of key downstream targets of p53, including the cell cycle regulator p21(WAF1), the apoptosis-inducing TRAIL Death Receptor DR5, and even MDM2 itself. Consequently, cancer cells expressing the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein exhibited a diminished response to chemotherapeutic agents, manifested by a reduced induction of these critical p53 targets and an increased cell viability following treatment.
Implications for Cancer Therapy
The ramifications of this discovery are far-reaching, particularly in the context of cancer treatment. Chemotherapy remains a cornerstone of cancer management, and its efficacy is heavily reliant on the proper functioning of cellular mechanisms that detect and respond to DNA damage. The p53 pathway plays a pivotal role in this intricate process, acting as a sentinel that triggers cell cycle arrest or apoptosis in response to genotoxic insults.
However, the findings of this study suggest that the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein may compromise these critical defense mechanisms, potentially rendering cancer cells more resistant to chemotherapeutic agents. This revelation raises concerns about the potential impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection or the administration of spike protein-based vaccines on the efficacy of cancer treatments, particularly in individuals undergoing chemotherapy.
Mechanistic Underpinnings
While the study has shed light on the disruption of the p53 pathway by the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, the precise mechanisms underlying this phenomenon remain to be fully elucidated. Several intriguing questions arise:
What are the structural determinants that govern the interaction between the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and components of the p53 pathway?
Could post-translational modifications of the spike protein or p53 itself influence their functional interplay?
How do different cellular contexts, such as varying expression levels of p53 regulators or the presence of specific mutations, modulate the observed effects?
Can this newfound knowledge be leveraged to develop strategies that mitigate the potential impact of SARS-CoV-2 on cancer treatment outcomes?
Addressing these questions will require a concerted effort from the scientific community, involving multidisciplinary collaborations and a diverse array of experimental approaches.
Expanding the Scope of Investigation
While the current study focused on the interaction between the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and the p53 pathway, it is essential to broaden the scope of investigation to encompass other viral proteins and their potential impact on cellular processes relevant to cancer development and progression. The SARS-CoV-2 genome encodes a multitude of proteins, each with the potential to interact with various host factors and signaling cascades.
Exploring these interactions may unveil additional mechanisms by which SARS-CoV-2 infection could influence tumorigenesis, metastasis, or therapeutic responses. Additionally, investigating the effects of viral proteins on DNA damage sensing, repair mechanisms, and other cellular stress response pathways could yield invaluable insights into the intricate interplay between viral infections and cancer biology.
Implications Beyond COVID-19
The findings of this study have implications that extend beyond the realm of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. They underscore the importance of thoroughly evaluating the potential consequences of viral proteins or antigens employed in vaccine development on critical host pathways, such as those involved in tumor suppression and DNA damage response.
As the scientific community continues to develop novel vaccines and therapeutic interventions, it is imperative to consider the potential impact of these interventions on cellular processes essential for maintaining genomic integrity and preventing malignant transformation. Comprehensive preclinical studies and rigorous safety assessments should be undertaken to ensure that the benefits of these interventions outweigh any potential risks, particularly for individuals with pre-existing conditions or those undergoing cancer treatment.
Collaborative Efforts & Future Directions
Unraveling the complexities of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein’s interactions with the p53 pathway and other cellular processes will require a concerted effort from researchers across various disciplines. Interdisciplinary collaborations between virologists, cancer biologists, structural biologists, and computational scientists will be crucial in elucidating the mechanistic underpinnings of these interactions and their potential implications for cancer development and treatment.
Furthermore, it is essential to conduct long-term studies to assess the potential long-term consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection or spike protein exposure on cancer incidence and progression. Such investigations could shed light on the potential risks associated with repeated exposure to viral proteins or antigens, as in the case of booster vaccinations.
A Call for Vigilance & Proactive Measures
The findings of this groundbreaking study serve as a clarion call for increased vigilance and proactive measures within the scientific community. As we continue to navigate the complexities of viral pandemics and develop innovative therapeutic interventions, it is imperative to remain cognizant of the potential unintended consequences on critical cellular pathways, such as those involved in tumor suppression and DNA damage response.
By fostering interdisciplinary collaborations, embracing rigorous scientific inquiry, and maintaining a commitment to thorough preclinical evaluation, we can ensure that our efforts to combat viral threats do not inadvertently compromise our ability to combat cancer and other life-threatening diseases.
The path forward is one of cautious optimism, where scientific discoveries illuminate potential risks while simultaneously paving the way for novel strategies to mitigate these risks and safeguard human health. It is through this delicate balance of exploration and prudence that we can continue to make strides in our fight against both viral and malignant diseases, ensuring a brighter and healthier future for all.
Click here to read the full research paper in Oncotarget.
—
Oncotarget is an open-access, peer-reviewed journal that has published primarily oncology-focused research papers since 2010. These papers are available to readers (at no cost and free of subscription barriers) in a continuous publishing format at Oncotarget.com.
Oncotarget is indexed and archived by PubMed/Medline, PubMed Central, Scopus, EMBASE, META (Chan Zuckerberg Initiative) (2018-2022), and Dimensions (Digital Science).
Click here to subscribe to Oncotarget publication updates.
In this new study, researchers investigated a promising new approach to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) therapy by combining multiple drugs to enhance cytotoxic effects on AML cells.
—
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a cancer characterized by the rapid growth of abnormal white blood cells that accumulate in the bone marrow and interfere with the production of normal blood cells. ABT199, also known as venetoclax, is a targeted therapy that inhibits the BCL-2 protein, which is often overexpressed in AML cells and contributes to their survival. By blocking this protein, venetoclax can trigger apoptosis, or programmed cell death, in cancer cells. Thiotepa, a DNA alkylating agent, has been used in conditioning regimens for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) but its combination with ABT199/venetoclax has not been thoroughly explored, until now.
“The results may provide relevant information for the design of clinical trials using these drugs to circumvent recognized drug-resistance mechanisms when used as part of pre-transplant conditioning regimens for AML patients undergoing allogenic HSCT.”
The Study
In this study, the researchers demonstrated a notable synergistic effect between ABT199/venetoclax and thiotepa, significantly amplifying cytotoxicity against AML cells. This effect was further magnified when these drugs were combined with fludarabine, cladribine, and busulfan, well-established chemotherapeutic agents renowned for their efficacy in AML treatment.
One pivotal discovery of the research lies in elucidating the molecular mechanism behind this heightened cytotoxicity. The combined drug regimen led to increased cleavage of Caspase 3, PARP1, and HSP90, recognized markers of apoptosis, indicative of a robust activation of the cell death pathway. Additionally, heightened Annexin V positivity, an indicator of early apoptosis stages, was observed, suggesting the effective initiation of cell death in AML cells.
The investigation also shed light on an augmented DNA damage response, evidenced by elevated levels of γ-H2AX, P-CHK1 (S317), P-CHK2 (S19), and P-SMC1 (S957). These markers imply that the drug combination not only induces apoptosis but also contributes to the accumulation of DNA damage in AML cells, further fostering their demise.
Another significant outcome was the activation of stress signaling pathways, reflected in increased levels of P-SAPK/JNK (T183/Y185) and decreased P-PI3Kp85 (Y458). These alterations indicate cellular stress induced by drug treatment, potentially heightening sensitivity to the cytotoxic effects of the combination therapy.
Furthermore, the study addressed the pressing issue of drug resistance, commonly encountered in AML treatment. The five-drug combination notably decreased the levels of BCL-2, BCL-xL, and MCL-1, proteins associated with resistance to venetoclax, suggesting potential efficacy in overcoming resistance and improving treatment outcomes for AML patients. Various AML cell lines, including those with P53-negative and FLT3-ITD-positive mutations associated with poor prognosis, were subjected to the drug combination.
Results & Conclusion
The results exhibited promising activity of the combination therapy against these challenging cell lines. Moreover, extending the findings to clinical relevance, the drug combination was tested on leukemia patient-derived cell samples, revealing enhanced activation of apoptosis, which hints at potential effectiveness in a clinical setting and provides a basis for future clinical trials.
The implications of this research are profound, offering a novel strategy for conditioning regimens in AML patients undergoing HSCT. Combining ABT199/venetoclax and thiotepa with fludarabine, cladribine, and busulfan presents a promising approach for eradicating AML cells and preparing patients for stem cell transplantation. In conclusion, the study signifies a significant advancement in combating AML. The synergistic effects observed in combining ABT199/venetoclax with thiotepa and other chemotherapeutic agents pave the way for enhancing treatment regimens. This research sets the stage for future clinical trials and the potential development of more effective therapies for AML patients.
“The results provide a rationale for clinical trials using these two- and five-drug combinations as part of a conditioning regimen for AML patients undergoing HSCT.”
Click here to read the full research paper in Oncotarget.
—
Oncotarget is an open-access, peer-reviewed journal that has published primarily oncology-focused research papers since 2010. These papers are available to readers (at no cost and free of subscription barriers) in a continuous publishing format at Oncotarget.com.
Oncotarget is indexed and archived by PubMed/Medline, PubMed Central, Scopus, EMBASE, META (Chan Zuckerberg Initiative) (2018-2022), and Dimensions (Digital Science).
Click here to subscribe to Oncotarget publication updates.
In this research perspective, researchers discuss causal and correlative approaches to identify potential biomarkers for predicting paclitaxel response.
—
Cancer therapy has come a long way from its one-size-fits-all beginning to the awakening era of personalized medicine. This change has been largely driven by the discovery of biomarkers. Biomarkers can help refine patient selection for specific therapies. A blend of causal and correlative approaches is needed to elucidate the full potential of biomarkers in cancer research. This fusion of methodologies allows for a comprehensive exploration of biomarker efficacy, leading to more accurate predictions of drug response.
“[…] studying the combination of non-overlapping biomarkers’ expression, in addition to clinical and sociodemographic data could generate predictive models for paclitaxel susceptibility.”
Combining Causal and Correlative Approaches
Paclitaxel is a mainstay of treatment for various cancers, including breast, pancreatic, ovarian, and non-small cell lung carcinomas. However, the benefit derived from paclitaxel treatment varies across patients, and a significant proportion does not receive therapeutic benefit and experiences unnecessary toxicity. The variability in response to paclitaxel underscores the need for predictive biomarkers. Predictive biomarkers of response to paclitaxel can lead to improved treatment efficacy, less unnecessary toxicity, and potentially better health outcomes.
In a recent study, researchers used a whole-genome CRISPR/Cas9 knockout to identify genes that influence paclitaxel susceptibility in gliomas. They identified 51 genes that have implications in pathways such as NFkB, toll-like receptor, and MAPK signaling, transcriptional misregulation, and apoptosis. The team also identified the signal sequence receptor 3 (SSR3) gene as a predictive biomarker for paclitaxel susceptibility.
The SSR3 gene encodes the gamma subunit of the signal sequence receptor (SSR) complex, a glycosylated membrane receptor located at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). This complex is involved in protein translocation across the ER membrane. In the study, it was found that higher SSR3 expression correlated with increased paclitaxel susceptibility in cancer cell lines. SSR3 knockout cells showed decreased susceptibility to paclitaxel, while cells overexpressing SSR3 had increased susceptibility.
The study also revealed a link between SSR3 and the unfolded protein response (UPR) pathway, which reduces the amount of unfolded proteins in the cell under stressful conditions. A positive correlation was found between SSR3 expression and IRE1a levels in glioma PDX cells. IRE1a is a serine/threonine kinase that is involved in the UPR pathway and has been implicated in various disorders.
Conclusions & Future Directions
A significant challenge in the treatment of glioblastoma is the blood-brain barrier which limits the efficacy of paclitaxel. However, innovative strategies like convection-enhanced delivery, biodegradable wafers, peptide-drug conjugates, and low-intensity pulsed ultrasound administered with microbubbles are being developed to overcome this barrier.
The researchers also wrote in their research perspective that, after identifying a potential predictive biomarker in a training cohort of patients, it is vital to validate the finding in an independent cohort. The correlation between patients’ overall survival and SSR3 expression is currently being studied in a phase 2 trial at Northwestern University. Based on the outcomes of these validations, the predictive models can be further refined by incorporating other non-overlapping histologic and molecular biomarkers along with patient demographics. The discovery of predictive biomarkers for paclitaxel response, such as SSR3, promises to significantly impact cancer treatment.
“Precision and personalized medicine can lead to a transition from a stochastic treatment response into predictable scenarios. Further identification of predictive biomarkers, validation, and study of combinations as predictive models is critical to generate a greater impact that can be translated to the bedside of patients.”
Click here to read the full research paper in Oncotarget.
—
Oncotarget is an open-access, peer-reviewed journal that has published primarily oncology-focused research papers since 2010. These papers are available to readers (at no cost and free of subscription barriers) in a continuous publishing format at Oncotarget.com.
Oncotarget is indexed and archived by PubMed/Medline, PubMed Central, Scopus, EMBASE, META (Chan Zuckerberg Initiative) (2018-2022), and Dimensions (Digital Science).
Click here to subscribe to Oncotarget publication updates.
In this study, researchers investigated the antitumor effects of Sacituzumab govitecan in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy.
The relentless search for effective cancer therapies has led to numerous breakthroughs in drug discovery and development. Advancements have emerged in recent years through the promising avenue of combination therapy, where two or more drugs are used synergistically to enhance their collective therapeutic effect. This strategy has shown significant potential in overcoming drug resistance, reducing side effects, and improving patient survival rates.
Sacituzumab govitecan is an innovative drug that has gained prominence in recent years due to its unique mechanism of action and remarkable antitumor effects. It is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of an anti-Trop-2-directed antibody linked with the topoisomerase I inhibitory drug, SN-38, via a proprietary hydrolysable linker. Trop-2 is a transmembrane glycoprotein that is highly expressed in various solid tumors, making it an attractive target for cancer therapy. SN-38, the active metabolite of the chemotherapy drug irinotecan, is a potent topoisomerase I inhibitor that triggers DNA damage and apoptosis in cancer cells.
Platinum-based chemotherapy, primarily cisplatin and carboplatin, is a cornerstone of cancer treatment. These drugs work by interfering with DNA replication in cancer cells, leading to cell death. However, their use is often limited by drug resistance and toxic side effects.
“Using multiple drugs to treat cancer may allow for direct activity against multiple targets simultaneously or may indirectly affect the same target through different mechanisms of action [16].”
The Study
The combination of Sacituzumab govitecan and platinum-based chemotherapy has the potential to overcome these limitations. In the current study, the researchers found this combination to produce significant antitumor effects in various cancer models, including triple-negative breast, urinary bladder, and small-cell lung carcinomas. They found that the combination treatment resulted in additive growth inhibitory effects in vitro. The combination led to significant down-regulation of anti-apoptotic proteins and up-regulation of pro-apoptotic proteins, suggesting a shift towards pro-apoptotic signaling.
The in vivo efficacy of the combination therapy was further confirmed in mice bearing human tumor xenografts. The combination of Sacituzumab govitecan and carboplatin or cisplatin resulted in significant tumor regressions in all tested models. Importantly, the combination therapy was well tolerated by the animals, indicating a favorable safety profile.
Conclusions
The findings from this study represent a significant leap forward in the field of chemotherapy combination therapy drug discovery. The team provided strong evidence to support the clinical investigation of Sacituzumab govitecan in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy for the treatment of various solid tumors. Future studies should investigate the optimal dosing and sequencing of this combination therapy to maximize its efficacy and minimize potential toxicities. Additionally, the exploration of potential biomarkers could help identify patients who are most likely to benefit from this combination therapy.
In summary, the combination of Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) and platinum-based chemotherapy holds great promise as a potent antitumor therapy. It represents a novel approach that could potentially revolutionize the treatment of various solid tumors and improve patient outcomes.
“Importantly, these data demonstrate significantly greater antitumor effects of SG plus carboplatin or cisplatin in tumor-bearing mice than monotherapies, and that they were well tolerated by the animals. Based on these results, SG plus platinum-based chemotherapeutics merit clinical investigation.”
Click here to read the full research paper in Oncotarget.
—
Oncotarget is an open-access, peer-reviewed journal that has published primarily oncology-focused research papers since 2010. These papers are available to readers (at no cost and free of subscription barriers) in a continuous publishing format at Oncotarget.com.
Oncotarget is indexed and archived byPubMed/Medline, PubMed Central, Scopus, EMBASE, META (Chan Zuckerberg Initiative) (2018-2022), and Dimensions (Digital Science).
Click here to subscribe to Oncotarget publication updates.
In this new study, researchers provide valuable insights into raw areca nut betel quid consumption and esophageal cancer.
—
Betel quid chewing, a traditional custom widely practiced in South Asia, Southeast Asia, the Asia-Pacific region, and East Africa for centuries, involves the consumption of raw areca nut mixed with slaked lime and wrapped in a betel leaf. This habit is particularly popular in certain regions, including Northeast India, where the areca nut is raw, wet, and consumed unprocessed. The act of chewing and swallowing this mixture leads to the release of alkaloids, polyphenols, and tannins. However, the consumption of raw areca nut betel quid has been strongly associated with the development of oral, esophageal, and gastric cancers, and has adverse consequences on oral health. Several studies have shown a significant relationship between periodontitis and betel quid chewing habits in many countries, including India.
Understanding the Mad2 Gene & Raw Areca Nut Betel Quid Consumption
The Mad2 gene, also known as the Mitotic Arrest Deficient 2 gene, plays a crucial role in regulating the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) during cell division. The SAC is responsible for ensuring the accurate distribution of chromosomes between daughter cells, preventing the formation of aneuploid cells. Aneuploidy, characterized by an abnormal number of chromosomes, is a hallmark of cancer and can drive tumor development and progression.
Building on this understanding, the researchers in this study turned their attention to the impact of raw areca nut betel quid consumption on Mad2 gene expression in esophageal cancer. They analyzed 131 esophageal cancer biopsies and peripheral blood samples from patients with a history of raw areca nut betel quid consumption. Using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and immunohistochemistry (IHC), they assessed the expression of the Mad2 gene. The results revealed that 41% of the samples overexpressed Mad2, while 50% showed downregulation.
To delve deeper into the underlying mechanisms of Mad2 gene deregulation, the researchers examined the patterns of histone H3 post-translational modifications in the promoter region of the Mad2 gene. Histone proteins, which play a crucial role in regulating gene expression by modulating the accessibility of DNA to the transcriptional machinery, were the focus of this part of the study. They specifically looked at modifications, including histone methylation (H3K4me3, H3K9me3) and histone acetylation (H3K9ac, H3K27ac), which are known to affect gene expression.
In order to assess the recruitment of these histone modifications in the Mad2 gene promoter region, Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays were performed on esophageal tumor tissues and adjacent normal tissues. The results revealed a significant decrease in H3K4me3 and H3K9ac levels in tumor tissues where Mad2 was underexpressed, while an increase in these modifications was observed in tumor tissues with Mad2 overexpression. Interestingly, repressive histone modifications such as H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 showed the opposite pattern.
Finally, the researchers conducted a loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analysis on a panel of 99 esophageal cancer tissues using microsatellite markers mapped to chromosome 4q, where the Mad2 gene is located. This analysis revealed deletions in at least one marker in 62% of the samples with a history of raw areca nut betel quid consumption. The most frequent deletion was observed in the 4q27 region, which is in close proximity to the Mad2 gene, providing further insight into the potential mechanisms of Mad2 deregulation in esophageal cancer.
Conclusions
The study provides valuable insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying Mad2 gene deregulation in esophageal cancer. The disruption of the 4q27 region, coupled with altered histone modifications, plays a crucial role in reducing Mad2 expression in raw areca nut-induced esophageal carcinogenesis. Mad2 gene expression levels can serve as a clinical biomarker for identifying patients with chromosomal abnormalities.
Further research is needed to fully understand the role of the Rb-E2F1 circuit in Mad2 gene deregulation and the implications for esophageal cancer prognosis. Investigating the potential therapeutic targeting of Mad2 and its downstream signaling pathways may lead to more effective treatments for esophageal cancer patients.
The differential expression of the Mad2 gene in esophageal cancer and its association with histone H3 post-translational modifications has implications for esophageal carcinogenesis. Understanding these mechanisms may pave the way for the development of novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for esophageal cancer patients.
Click here to read the full research paper in Oncotarget.
—
Oncotarget is an open-access, peer-reviewed journal that has published primarily oncology-focused research papers since 2010. These papers are available to readers (at no cost and free of subscription barriers) in a continuous publishing format at Oncotarget.com. Oncotarget is indexed/archived on MEDLINE / PMC / PubMed.
Click here to subscribe to Oncotarget publication updates.
Crossref is a non-profit organization that logs and updates citations for scientific publications. Each month, Crossref identifies a list of the most popular Oncotarget papers based on the number of times a DOI is successfully resolved.
Below are Crossref’s Top 10 Oncotarget DOIs published in 2023.
Authors: Md Maksudul Alam, Janmaris Marin Fermin, Mark Knackstedt, Mackenzie J. Noonan, Taylor Powell, Landon Goodreau, Emily K. Daniel, Xiaohua Rong, Tara Moore-Medlin, Alok R. Khandelwal, and Cherie-Ann O. Nathan
Quote: “In this study, the ICPI [inflammation-combined prognostic index] was devised as a novel predictive index of prognosis, and its usefulness was clarified.”
Quote: “[…] the study of immunotherapy for treating triple negative breast cancer might still be at its early stages of development but is full of future promise.”
Authors: Maroun Bou Zerdan, Lewis Nasr, Farhan Khalid, Sabine Allam, Youssef Bouferraa, Saba Batool, Muhammad Tayyeb, Shubham Adroja, Mahinbanu Mammadii, Faiz Anwer, Shahzad Raza, and Chakra P. Chaulagain
Quote: “AL amyloidosis is a fatal disease and systemic therapy is required to prevent deposition of amyloid in other organs and prevent progressive organ failure.”
Quote: “Here, we provide a brief overview of the status quo of targeting mitochondrial energy metabolism in glioblastoma and highlight a novel combination therapy.”
Quote: “In breast cancer, MTAP downregulation activates ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) which in turn leads to formation of putrescine which promotes tumor migration, invasion and angiogenesis.”
Quote: “[…] we consider some public molecular resources, including proteomics datasets, that may be leveraged to help identify gene candidates for therapeutic targeting in cancer.”
—
Click here to read the latest papers published by Oncotarget.
—
Oncotarget is an open-access, peer-reviewed journal that has published primarily oncology-focused research papers since 2010. These papers are available to readers (at no cost and free of subscription barriers) in a continuous publishing format at Oncotarget.com. Oncotarget is indexed/archived on MEDLINE / PMC / PubMed.
Click here to subscribe to Oncotarget publication updates.
