In a new editorial paper, researchers highlight the role of GLS2 in regulating ferroptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma.
—
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of liver cancer. It is particularly challenging to treat because HCC is often diagnosed in late stage and resistant to chemotherapy and radiation. However, advancements in targeted therapies and immunotherapies have opened new avenues for the treatment of this aggressive disease.
In a new editorial paper, researchers Sawako Suzuki, Divya Venkatesh, Tomoaki Tanaka, and Carol Prives from Columbia University highlight the role of a metabolic enzyme known as glutamine synthase 2 (GLS2) in regulating ferroptosis in HCC. Ferroptosis is a form of cell death that involves iron-dependent accumulation of lipid peroxides. On October 19, 2023, their editorial was published in Oncotarget, entitled, “GLS2 shapes ferroptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma.”
GLS2 Promotes Ferroptosis in HCC
GLS2 is a key enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of glutamine to glutamate, a precursor of alpha-ketoglutarate (αKG), a molecule that participates in several metabolic pathways, such as the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, redox homeostasis and lipid and amino acid metabolism. GLS2 is also a transcriptional target of the tumor suppressor protein p53, which regulates its expression in response to cellular stress.
In this editorial, the researchers summarize findings from their recent study, which demonstrated that GLS2 is a bona fide tumor suppressor and a regulator of ferroptosis in HCC using mouse models and human cancer cells. The team showed that GLS2 deficiency leads to increased HCC tumorigenesis and resistance to ferroptosis, while GLS2 overexpression reduces tumor growth and sensitizes cancer cells to ferroptosis.
The mechanism by which GLS2 promotes ferroptosis involves its catalytic activity, which facilitates the production of αKG from glutamate. αKG then enhances lipid reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation by inhibiting the activity of glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4), an enzyme that protects cells from lipid peroxidation. Thus, GLS2 acts as a metabolic switch that favors ferroptosis by increasing lipid ROS levels.
“Our work has now provided evidence that GLS2 is mainly localized in mitochondria and induces ferroptosis through α-ketoglutarate (αKG), and this occurs specifically under conditions where the levels of GSH [glutathione] or of glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) are suppressed by ferroptosis inducers [7].”
Conclusions
The authors also provided evidence that GLS2-mediated regulation of ferroptosis has clinical relevance for human HCC. They found that GLS2 expression is frequently downregulated in human HCC samples and correlates with poor prognosis. Moreover, they showed that GLS2 expression is associated with sensitivity to erastin, a ferroptosis-inducing agent, in human HCC cell lines.
These results suggest that GLS2 is a potential therapeutic target for HCC and that its modulation could enhance the efficacy of ferroptosis-based therapies. The editorial paper concludes by discussing the challenges and opportunities for further research on the role of GLS2 and ferroptosis in liver disease.
“If indeed GLS2 can promote chemically-induced ferroptosis irrespective of the tissue type, then the drug regimen will need to be tailored such that the liver tissues adjacent to HCC are protected. Taking these concerns into consideration, we hope that our findings will inform future decisions regarding treatment of liver disease.”
Click here to read the full editorial paper in Oncotarget.
—
Oncotarget is an open-access, peer-reviewed journal that has published primarily oncology-focused research papers since 2010. These papers are available to readers (at no cost and free of subscription barriers) in a continuous publishing format at Oncotarget.com. Oncotarget is indexed/archived on MEDLINE / PMC / PubMed.
Click here to subscribe to Oncotarget publication updates.
In this new study, researchers aimed to determine the genetic predisposition to early breast cancer in women from Kazakhstan.
Breast cancer (BC) is one of the most common and deadly cancers worldwide, affecting millions of women every year. However, not all women share the same risk of developing breast cancer. There are many factors that influence this disease, including age, lifestyle, family history, and genetic makeup.
One of the most important aspects of breast cancer research is to identify the genetic factors that predispose some women to develop breast cancer at an early age, especially in different ethnic groups that may have unique genetic variants. This can help to improve the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer, as well as to reduce the health disparities among different populations.
“Our study may reveal previously uncharacterized population-specific variants that may increase the risk of BC in the Kazakh population.”
The Study
The researchers enrolled 224 unrelated Kazakh women diagnosed with early onset breast cancer. All patients were treated at the Kazakh Institute of Oncology and Radiology from August 2017 to October 2019. Cohort characteristics reported that the median age of the women was 34.6 years old (ranging between 19 and 40 years), 15.6% were diagnosed under the age of 30 and 13.8% had breast cancer within their family history. The researchers utilized next-generation sequencing (NGS) to perform a comprehensive analysis of germline mutations and gene expression profiles using the MiSeq platform. They used a targeted panel of 94 cancer-associated genes, including a vast number of genes implicated in hereditary cancer syndromes and overall breast cancer predisposition.
“To our knowledge, this is the first study using NGS technology to study the genetic predisposition to early-onset BC women from Kazakhstan and assess their impact on the patients’ clinical outcomes.”
The NGS-based multigene panel testing allowed the researchers to identify recurrent, possible founder and novel PVs in Kazakh women with early-onset BC that were undetected in earlier studies. Among 57 patients (25.4%), 38 unique pathogenic variants (PVs) were identified in 13 different cancer-predisposing genes. Notably, 12 of the 38 PVs were recurrent, including specific variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, which may represent founder mutations in this population. BRCA1 carriers had a significantly higher likelihood of developing triple-negative breast cancer and having a family history of breast cancer compared to non-carriers. Six of the 38 variants were novel.
“We demonstrated the remarkable efficacy of an NGS-based panel to identify rare germline variants in early onset BC patients. These findings could contribute to the development of population-specific multigene panels for more rapid and cost-effective testing.”
Conclusions
The study provides valuable insights into the genetic predisposition of early breast cancer in women of Kazakh ethnicity. It also highlights the value of next generation sequencing technology and the importance of studying different ethnic groups to understand the diversity and complexity of breast cancer genetics. The authors suggest that broadening the scope of genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer from only BRCA genes to testing multiple genes at once could lead to better results. However, further studies are needed to validate the clinical utility of the panels used in this study. Nonetheless, these findings may aid in developing personalized risk assessment and management strategies for Kazakh women with early-onset breast cancer, as well as to inform future clinical trials and treatments.
“With this in mind, we will focus in the future on segregation analyses of family members and functional analyses to evaluate the inheritance pattern and pathogenicity of the identified recurrent and novel BC variants. Retrospective analyses of their possible association with progression-free, metastasis-free, and overall survival are also an exciting direction for future research. No less interesting would be the study of these variants regarding the chemosensitivity and efficacy of specific targeted therapies for their carriers.”
Click here to read the full research paper in Oncotarget.
—
Oncotarget is an open-access, peer-reviewed journal that has published primarily oncology-focused research papers since 2010. These papers are available to readers (at no cost and free of subscription barriers) in a continuous publishing format at Oncotarget.com. Oncotarget is indexed/archived on MEDLINE / PMC / PubMed.
Click here to subscribe to Oncotarget publication updates.
In a recent editorial, researchers discuss targeting fatty acid binding proteins to fight multiple myeloma.
—
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a type of blood cancer that affects plasma cells, which are responsible for producing antibodies. MM is characterized by the accumulation of abnormal plasma cells in the bone marrow, leading to bone damage, kidney failure, anemia, and increased susceptibility to infections. MM is a heterogeneous disease with different subtypes and genetic mutations that affect the prognosis and response to treatment. Therefore, there is a need for new biomarkers and therapeutic targets that can improve the outcomes of MM patients.
One of the potential targets that has recently emerged is the fatty acid binding protein (FABP) family. FABPs are proteins that bind and transport fatty acids, which are essential for energy production, cell signaling and membrane synthesis. FABPs are expressed in various tissues and organs, and have different roles depending on their location and type. There are nine members of the FABP family, but FABP5 seems to be the most relevant for MM.
“The FABPs hold promise as new therapeutic targets in multiple myeloma (MM), as described by our laboratory, and supported by in silico analyses [2] and other data [3, 4].”
Editorial Summary
The authors found that FABP5 expression is higher in MM cells than in normal plasma cells, and that high FABP5 levels are associated with worse survival and progression in MM patients. They also show that FABP inhibitors can reduce MM cell growth, survival and proliferation by affecting various pathways and processes, such as:
The unfolded protein response and ER stress response, which are activated by the high protein production in MM cells
The reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, which can cause oxidative damage and apoptosis
The MYC oncogene expression and activity, which is essential for MM cell survival and proliferation
The mitochondrial function and metabolism, which are altered in MM cells to favor fatty acid oxidation
The DNA methylation patterns, which can affect gene expression and epigenetic regulation
The immune cell infiltration and cytokine production in the bone marrow microenvironment, which can modulate the tumor-host interactions
The researchers also highlighted findings from other studies that support the importance of FABPs in MM. For example, Jia et al. found that FABP5 expression correlates with immune cell changes in the MM microenvironment. Liang et al. found that FABP4 expression is increased in MM patients and that FABP4 knockout or inhibition can improve survival and reduce tumor burden in mice models.
“We reported studies showing either decreased tumor burden or no effect of FABP inhibition in vivo, and thus further optimization of in vivo targeting of FABPs, FABP inhibitor design, or overcoming FABP inhibitor resistance in the bone marrow is still required before translation to the clinic can materialize [1].”
Conclusion
The authors conclude that FABPs are promising prognostic markers and therapeutic targets in MM, and that further research is needed to elucidate their mechanisms of action and to develop specific inhibitors. They also suggest that targeting both tumor cell-derived and microenvironment-derived FABPs may be more effective than targeting either one alone.
This editorial provides a concise overview of the current state of knowledge on FABPs in MM, and highlights the potential benefits of targeting them for MM treatment. It also raises some interesting questions for future research, such as:
How do FABPs interact with other metabolic pathways and regulators in MM cells?
How do FABPs affect the bone remodeling process and osteolytic lesions in MM?
How do FABPs influence the drug resistance and relapse in MM?
How do different types of FABPs cooperate or compete with each other in MM?
How can FABP inhibitors be combined with other therapies for optimal efficacy and safety?
“Still, we are hopeful that by targeting FABPs, or following the science to other related pathways, it will be possible to revolutionize the therapy regimes currently used for MM patients.”
Click here to read the full editorial in Oncotarget.
—
Oncotarget is an open-access, peer-reviewed journal that has published primarily oncology-focused research papers since 2010. These papers are available to readers (at no cost and free of subscription barriers) in a continuous publishing format at Oncotarget.com. Oncotarget is indexed/archived on MEDLINE / PMC / PubMed.
Click here to subscribe to Oncotarget publication updates.
In a new editorial, researchers from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign discuss the value of using computational models to predict the functions of cancer-associated genetic variants.
“To date, over 490,000 genotype-phenotype associations have been discovered through large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) [1]; however, molecular functions of most of these discovered GWAS variants remain unknown.”
In this editorial, the authors review recent advances and challenges in identifying and characterizing the functional effects of genetic variants that affect gene regulation, such as enhancers, promoters, and transcription factors. These variants, also known as expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs), can modulate the expression levels of genes and influence various cellular processes and phenotypes, including cancer susceptibility and response to therapy.
The authors propose a framework for predicting the molecular functions of eQTLs based on their genomic context, epigenetic marks, chromatin accessibility, and three-dimensional interactions. They also discuss how to integrate multiple types of data and methods to improve the accuracy and interpretability of the predictions. Furthermore, they highlight the potential applications and implications of their approach for cancer research and precision medicine.
“A promising approach to address these challenges is to integrate genomic, epigenomic, transcriptomic and machine learning methods to identify functional genetic variants and characterize their mode of action in regulating target genes.”
Use Case: MITF and MYC
Microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) and MYC are two proteins of significant interest in cancer research. Due to their roles in gene regulation and their implications in cancer development and progression, they have been distinguished as oncoproteins. MITF and MYC belong to the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH)-Zip family of transcription factors (TFs) and have a penchant for hexamer E-box motifs. E-box motifs play a crucial role in regulating gene expression by serving as binding sites for TFs, which can activate or repress the transcription of nearby genes. MITF and MYC are active in melanocytes and possibly vie for shared binding sites.
In their recent study, the researchers aimed to investigate how MITF and MYC interact with each other and with the E-box motifs in the melanocyte genome. They hypothesized that MITF and MYC might have different preferences for E-box variants, which could affect their binding affinity and gene regulation. To test this hypothesis, they used chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) to map the genome-wide binding sites of MITF and MYC in melanocytes. They also used RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) to measure the gene expression changes after knocking down MITF or MYC. By integrating these data sets, they were able to identify the E-box motifs that were enriched or depleted in the binding sites of MITF and MYC, as well as the genes that were differentially expressed after altering their levels.
The results showed that MITF and MYC had distinct preferences for E-box variants, with MITF favoring CACGTG and MYC favoring CACATG. These preferences were consistent with their roles in gene regulation, as MITF was more likely to activate genes involved in melanocyte differentiation and pigmentation, while MYC was more likely to activate genes involved in cell proliferation and metabolism. The researchers also found that MITF and MYC had overlapping binding sites in some regions of the genome, which suggested that they might compete or cooperate with each other depending on the local context. Furthermore, they discovered that some E-box motifs were associated with higher or lower gene expression regardless of the presence of MITF or MYC, which indicated that other factors might also influence the transcriptional outcome.
The study provided new insights into the molecular mechanisms of MITF and MYC in melanocyte biology and cancer. It also demonstrated the utility of computational models for predicting TF binding sites and gene expression based on sequence features. The researchers suggested that future studies could extend their approach to other TFs and cell types, as well as explore the functional consequences of MITF-MYC interactions in vivo.
Conclusion
This editorial paper is a timely and comprehensive overview of the current and future directions in the field of functional genomics of cancer-associated eQTLs. It provides valuable insights and guidance for researchers who are interested in exploring this important and rapidly evolving area. Read the full paper to learn more about how to predict the molecular functions of regulatory genetic variants associated with cancer.
“Effectively integrating these rich resources with GWAS results will continue to help prioritize causative inherited genetic variants and improve our molecular understanding of disease etiology, assisting the discovery of actionable genes to improve human health.”
Click here to read the full editorial in Oncotarget.
—
Oncotarget is an open-access, peer-reviewed journal that has published primarily oncology-focused research papers since 2010. These papers are available to readers (at no cost and free of subscription barriers) in a continuous publishing format at Oncotarget.com. Oncotarget is indexed/archived on MEDLINE / PMC / PubMed.
Click here to subscribe to Oncotarget publication updates.
In a new editorial paper, researchers from Tel Aviv University discuss a recent study exploring how whole-genome doubling shapes the aneuploidy landscape of human cancers.
—
Whole-genome doubling (WGD) and aneuploidy are two common genomic alterations that occur in human cancers. WGD is a macro-evolutionary event that results in the duplication of the entire genome, while aneuploidy is a micro-evolutionary event that results in the gain or loss of individual chromosomes or chromosome arms. Both WGD and aneuploidy can have profound effects on cellular physiology, gene expression and genome stability, and are associated with tumor initiation, progression and drug resistance.
“It is known that tumors that have undergone WGD are more permissive to aneuploidy, but whether WGD also affects aneuploidy patterns has remained an open question.”
The Study
The researchers analyzed 5,586 clinical tumor samples that had not undergone WGD (WGD-) and 3,435 tumors that had (WGD+) from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), across 22 tumor types. They found that WGD+ tumors were characterized by more promiscuous aneuploidy patterns, in line with increased aneuploidy tolerance. The relative prevalence of recurrent aneuploidies decreased in WGD+ tumors, suggesting that WGD+ tumors are more tolerant to aneuploidy than WGD- tumors.
The genetic interactions between chromosome arms differed between WGD- and WGD+ tumors, resulting in different co-occurrence and mutual exclusivity patterns. The proportion of whole-chromosome aneuploidy was significantly higher in WGD+ tumors than in WGD- tumors, indicating that different mechanisms of aneuploidy formation are dominant in WGD- and WGD+ tumors. The authors proposed that whole-chromosome missegregation is more prevalent in WGD+ tumors due to increased centrosome amplification and multipolar mitoses.
To validate their findings from the clinical tumor analysis, the authors used human cancer cell lines that reproduced the WGD/aneuploidy interactions observed in vivo. They also induced WGD in human colon cancer cell lines by treating them with a microtubule-stabilizing drug, and followed the evolution of aneuploidy in the isogenic WGD+/WGD- cells under standard or selective conditions. These experiments confirmed that WGD alters the aneuploidy landscape of human cancer cells, and revealed a causal link between WGD and altered aneuploidy patterns.
“We note that these experiments were not powered to assess the associations between specific aneuploidies, which remain to be experimentally validated in future studies.”
Conclusions & Future Studies
In their editorial, the researchers note that their study prompts questions about how different tetraploidization methods affect aneuploidy landscapes. They used cytokinesis failure for cell lines, but processes like cell fusion could impact aneuploidy differently. Further research should explore how selection pressures shape karyotype evolution, considering factors beyond tissue type. Analyzing intra-chromosomal arm-level vs. whole-chromosomal aneuploidies may identify cancer-driving chromosome arms. Overall, this study provides novel insights into how WGD and aneuploidy interact in human cancer, and how this interaction affects tumor evolution. The authors suggest that the interaction between WGD and aneuploidy is a major contributor to tumor heterogeneity, adaptation, and drug resistance, and that targeting this interaction could be a promising therapeutic strategy.
“In summary, our recent study shows that WGD contributes to aneuploidy formation in human tumors in both qualitative and quantitative ways. Hence, we propose that the WGD status of the tumor should be taken into account when examining the tumorigenic role of individual aneuploidies or aneuploidy patterns. In general, WGD should be considered in the study of aneuploidy landscapes in human cancers.”
Click here to read the full editorial in Oncotarget.
—
Oncotarget is an open-access, peer-reviewed journal that has published primarily oncology-focused research papers since 2010. These papers are available to readers (at no cost and free of subscription barriers) in a continuous publishing format at Oncotarget.com. Oncotarget is indexed/archived on MEDLINE / PMC / PubMed.
Click here to subscribe to Oncotarget publication updates.
In a new editorial, researchers from Instituto Nacional de Cancerología discuss the obesity paradox and its potential therapeutic opportunities in the context of lung cancer.
The strong correlation between obesity and a myriad of life-limiting diseases and conditions, including type 2 diabetes, is widely recognized and acknowledged in the research community. A less defined correlation is that between obesity, diabetes and lung cancer. Whether this association is directly causal or if there are underlying contributing factors is not yet clear.
“Although obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have been associated with lung cancer (LC) development, several confounding factors, such as chronic inflammation, high insulin levels, microbiome, as well as the oncogenic potential of growth and sexual hormones, have introduced uncertainty and avoid the fully recognition of this relationship [1, 2].”
Given the existence of this association, scientists are testing therapeutic regimens that may have the potential to fight all three issues — together. Metformin, a drug commonly prescribed to treat type 2 diabetes, helps lower blood sugar levels by improving insulin sensitivity and reducing glucose production in the liver. The metabolic-modifying properties of metformin aid in treating diabetes and obesity. Metformin has also garnered attention for its potential anti-aging properties and may hold promise for treating age-related diseases, including cancer. Lately, there has been growing interest in testing metformin in combination therapies to combat cancer-promoting conditions induced by obesity.
The “Obesity Paradox”
While the link between morbidity and obesity may seem cut-and-dry, researchers have discovered a surprising trend. The “obesity paradox” suggests that, in certain instances, individuals classified as overweight or mildly obese seem to fare better or have a survival advantage compared to those with normal weight or even underweight counterparts. This paradox has been particularly observed in certain chronic illnesses, such as heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and even in the context of aging. Researchers are still striving to understand the underlying mechanisms driving this phenomenon.
In a new editorial, researchers Pedro Barrios-Bernal, Norma Hernández-Pedro, Luis Lara-Mejía, and Oscar Arrieta from Instituto Nacional de Cancerología in Mexico City, Mexico, discuss the obesity paradox and its potential therapeutic opportunities in the context of lung cancer. Their editorial paper was published in Oncotargeton July 1, 2023, and entitled, “Obesity paradox and lung cancer, metformin-based therapeutic opportunity?” They suggest that metformin may have potential therapeutic effects for both obesity and lung cancer. The researchers explore the mechanisms by which metformin may modify tumor metastatic properties and promote an antitumor immune response. They also discuss the potential implications of the obesity paradox in the context of lung cancer treatment and the potential benefits of metformin use in combination with antineoplastic therapies.
In a 2019 study, the researchers conducted a phase 2 randomized clinical trial investigating the effect of metformin combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (compared to TKIs alone) in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated lung adenocarcinoma. They found that the addition of metformin to standard EGFR-TKI therapy in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma significantly improved progression-free survival. In their 2022 study, the researchers performed a secondary analysis of the same study, now measuring the association of body mass index (BMI). This time, they reported that the survival outcome in patients with EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma was greater with patients with a BMI higher than 24. The findings suggest that this treatment combination has a selective effect in obese populations and a lack of benefit in patients with a BMI less than 24, thus contributing to the obesity paradox.
“These findings suggest a strong sensitization by the addition of metformin in obese population, suggesting that biochemical and molecular differences influence the treatment response [8].”
Reflections & Future Research
In conclusion, the relationship between obesity, type 2 diabetes and lung cancer remains a subject of ongoing research. Metformin shows promise as a potential multipurpose treatment option, exhibiting properties beneficial for diabetes, obesity, aging, and cancer. The obesity paradox adds a layer of complexity to the obesity-cancer relationship, with some studies suggesting better survival rates and treatment response in overweight or mildly obese individuals treated with metformin. The researchers add that further investigation is needed to determine whether any of the proposed mechanisms of metformin have clinically meaningful activity in the treatment of obese patients with lung cancer. The ongoing research surrounding metformin and its interactions with obesity and cancer may lead to improved therapeutic strategies for these interconnected health challenges.
“Until then, we propose that pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, metabolic parameters, tumor biology, biochemical and molecular modifications may be related to the ‘obesity paradox’ and must be taken into account to choose the most appropriate treatment.”
Click here to read the full editorial in Oncotarget.
—
Oncotarget is an open-access, peer-reviewed journal that has published primarily oncology-focused research papers since 2010. These papers are available to readers (at no cost and free of subscription barriers) in a continuous publishing format at Oncotarget.com. Oncotarget is indexed/archived on MEDLINE / PMC / PubMed.
Click here to subscribe to Oncotarget publication updates.
In a new review, researchers from The Hebrew University of Jerusalem discuss the challenges associated with targeting Ras proteins and how protein engineering has emerged as a promising method to overcome these challenges.
Figure 3: Various scaffolds utilized to engineer binders to Ras and their binding epitopes.
Ras plays a crucial role in controlling various cellular processes by switching between active (Ras-GTP) and inactive (Ras-GDP) states with the help of specific molecules. In its active form, Ras interacts with multiple effector proteins, initiating downstream events. Humans have three Ras genes, resulting in four isoforms that have distinct expression patterns and unique functions in different tissues. Posttranslational modifications target Ras to the cell membrane, where it can form dimers and interact with effectors through common domains. Ras mutations, commonly found in pancreatic, colorectal and lung cancers, lock Ras in an active state, promoting continuous cell division and proliferation. Ras signaling disruption occurs through reduced catalytic activity, altered effector binding and decreased affinity for other regulatory proteins.
Although Ras has been considered difficult to target, recent advancements have identified potential binding pockets that can be addressed by small molecules, peptidomimetics and proteins. Inhibitors designed to covalently bind to the Ras G12C mutant have shown promise, leading to FDA-approved drugs for specific lung cancers. Additionally, protein-based inhibitors that target Ras and its interactions with effectors, regulatory proteins and guanine nucleotide exchange factors offer alternative strategies for therapeutic intervention. These developments have challenged the notion that Ras is “undruggable” and highlight the potential for effective treatments against various cancer types.
On July 1, 2023, researchers Atilio Tomazini and Julia M. Shifman from The Hebrew University of Jerusalem published a new review paper in Oncotarget, entitled, “Targeting Ras with protein engineering.” The authors provide an overview of the challenges associated with targeting Ras proteins with small molecules and discuss how protein engineering has emerged as a promising method to overcome these challenges.
“While the development of small-molecule Ras inhibitors has been reviewed elsewhere [40], we focus our review on protein-based Ras inhibitors, describing the methods for their engineering, various scaffolds used for inhibitor design, and prospects for delivery of the designed Ras inhibitors into the cellular cytoplasm, where Ras is located.”
Protein Engineering
Protein scaffolds offer alternative approaches to small molecule drugs for engineering protein-based inhibitors. Unlike small molecules, protein domains can bind to targets through large surface areas, providing high affinity and specificity. Antibodies, natural protein effectors and novel binding domains are commonly used as protein scaffolds. Antibodies can be engineered into smaller versions to overcome limitations, while natural effectors can be modified to enhance binding affinity. Novel binding domains, unrelated to the target protein, possess structural robustness and can be evolved to exhibit strong binding. All three classes of protein scaffolds have been utilized to engineer Ras binders and explore strategies to inhibit Ras oncogenesis.
“Interestingly, all classes of protein scaffolds, including antibodies, natural effectors, and novel binding domains, have been utilized for engineering of Ras binders, allowing scientists to target various sites on the Ras surface and to explore different strategies for inhibiting Ras oncogenesis […].”
Methods for engineering protein inhibitors can be categorized into experimental directed evolution and computational design, or a combination of both. Experimental techniques involve display technologies such as phage display, yeast surface display, ribosome display, and mRNA display. These methods allow for the construction of combinatorial libraries of protein mutants, which are then screened using the target protein as a selection “bait.” The selected binders are sequenced to identify high-affinity mutants. Negative selection steps can be incorporated to enhance specificity by eliminating binders to unwanted targets. The number of mutants that can be assayed depends on the display technology used, with each approach having its limitations.
In addition to experimental approaches, computational methods have been proposed for protein binder design. Computational design enables rational targeting of specific binding epitopes on the target protein. However, computationally designed binders often have weak initial binding affinities and require affinity maturation through experimental techniques. Computational methods have been successful in designing focused libraries for yeast surface display experiments, where small libraries of protein mutants are designed based on computational predictions. This approach narrows down the choices to the most promising mutants, facilitating directed evolution experiments. By combining computational and experimental approaches, protein inhibitors with superior affinity and specificity have been developed.
“We have summarized all the described engineered Ras protein-based binders and their properties in Table 1.”
The Future of Intracellular Transport for Ras Inhibitors
Efficient delivery of molecules that bind to intracellular Ras proteins is essential for suppressing pro-cancer pathways and promoting anti-cancer activities. To overcome the challenge of crossing the cell membrane, different strategies have emerged. One approach involves utilizing short cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) that can be fused to the desired protein, allowing entry into cells through direct translocation or endocytosis. However, improving the release of cargo proteins from endosomes remains a hurdle. Supercharging proteins with positively charged surfaces or leveraging bacterial toxins with intrinsic delivery mechanisms are alternative methods for intracellular protein delivery. Additionally, coupling cargo proteins to nanoparticles or employing mRNA delivery systems have shown promise, although they have their own limitations.
These protein delivery techniques have been explored for targeting Ras inhibitors. For instance, a human IgG1 antibody was engineered to selectively bind to Ras-GTP, inhibiting downstream signaling. Fusion of Ras binding domains to CPPs demonstrated competitive inhibition of Ras/effector interactions. Furthermore, optimized bacterial secretion systems and lipid nanoparticle-encapsulated mRNA platforms have been employed for efficient intracellular delivery of Ras-binding molecules. These advancements open up possibilities for targeted cancer therapies and disease treatments by enabling effective delivery of Ras binders to their intracellular target, thus influencing cancer-related signaling pathways.
Conclusions
In summary, targeting Ras proteins, despite their historically challenging nature, has seen significant progress in recent years. Small molecules, peptidomimetics and protein-based inhibitors have emerged as potential strategies for inhibiting Ras oncogenesis. Protein engineering, utilizing various protein scaffolds such as antibodies, natural effectors and novel binding domains, offers alternative approaches to traditional small molecule drugs.
Experimental directed evolution and computational design, alone or in combination, have facilitated the development of high-affinity and specific protein inhibitors. Furthermore, the efficient intracellular delivery methods described above hold promise for targeted cancer therapies by effectively delivering Ras binders to their intracellular targets. These advancements challenge the perception of Ras as “undruggable” and provide hope for the development of effective treatments for various cancer types.
“These strategies should be utilized in future to examine the beneficial activity of Ras-binders and inhibitors and should further facilitate the development of protein-based Ras therapeutics.”
Oncotarget is an open-access, peer-reviewed journal that has published primarily oncology-focused research papers since 2010. These papers are available to readers (at no cost and free of subscription barriers) in a continuous publishing format at Oncotarget.com. Oncotarget is indexed/archived on MEDLINE / PMC / PubMed.
Click here to subscribe to Oncotarget publication updates.
In a new editorial, researchers discuss a study using their team’s new genetically engineered mouse (GEM) model to assess PLK1 as a driver of oncogenic transformation.
On the bright side, polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) is considered a master regulator of the ever-important cell cycle. On the dark side, PLK1 expression (at both the mRNA and protein level) has shown to be upregulated in tumor cells, suggesting that PLK1 may also contribute to tumorigenesis. Despite this direct association, researchers studying the role of PLK1 in cancer have encountered a problem: a lack of appropriate animal models for experimentation.
“Even though studies have suggested that PLK1 contributes to tumorigenesis, the ability of PLK1 to drive oncogenic transformation on its own in vivo was still questionable due to a lack of sophisticated animal models for experimentation [18, 19].”
“To address this important scientific question, we generated a new genetically engineered mouse (GEM) model using the CAGGS (cytomegalovirus (CMV) early enhancer/chicken β-actin) promoter to drive exogenous PLK1 expression, allowing its ubiquitous and robust gene expression in transgenic mice [20].”
In an effort to determine if PLK1 overexpression causes tumors, the researchers created a new GEM mouse model that expresses high levels of PLK1. These high levels caused various types of spontaneous tumors. The increased PLK1 levels caused defects in cell division and resulted in abnormal numbers of centrosomes and compromised cell cycle checkpoints. This allowed for the accumulation of chromosomal instability, leading to abnormal numbers of chromosomes and tumor formation. In human cancers, higher PLK1 expression was associated with an increase in genome-wide copy number alterations. Their study provides evidence that abnormal PLK1 expression can trigger chromosomal instability and tumor formation, suggesting potential therapeutic opportunities for cancers with chromosomal instability.
“In summary, this study provides a novel GEM model that recapitulates the increased PLK1 expression observed in many human cancers and demonstrates that PLK1 overexpression drives spontaneous tumor formation in multiples organs in mouse, revealing the dark side of PLK1 as a potent proto-oncogene.”
Conclusions
In conclusion, the limitations of previous studies on PLK1 and its role in cancer have been partially addressed by the development of the new GEM model created by these researchers. This model allowed the team to examine PLK1’s ability to drive oncogenic transformation in vivo. Their study demonstrates that overexpression of PLK1 leads to the formation of spontaneous tumors in multiple organs, highlighting the dark side of PLK1 as a potent proto-oncogene. The findings of this study provide valuable insights into the role of PLK1 in tumorigenesis and suggest potential therapeutic opportunities for cancers associated with chromosomal instability. This breakthrough in animal models opens up new avenues for further research in understanding the mechanisms underlying PLK1-related tumorigenesis and developing targeted therapies to combat cancer.
“Alternative therapeutic strategies, such as co-delivery systems using nanoparticles or combination therapies, are under development in order to enhance the efficacy of PLK1 inhibition [25–28]. With expanding discoveries of PLK1 function and mechanisms of action, we hope that PLK1-targeted therapies will soon join the frontlines in the fight against cancer.”
Click here to read the full editorial paper in Oncotarget.
Oncotarget is an open-access, peer-reviewed journal that has published primarily oncology-focused research papers since 2010. These papers are available to readers (at no cost and free of subscription barriers) in a continuous publishing format at Oncotarget.com. Oncotarget is indexed/archived on MEDLINE / PMC / PubMed.
Click here to subscribe to Oncotarget publication updates.
In a new study, researchers found that 38.4% of a cohort in Saudi Arabia carried pathogenic variants linked to hereditary cancer risk.
Familial cancer is a fearsome reality for millions of people worldwide. While some cases of familial cancer syndrome (FCS) may be influenced by shared environmental or lifestyle factors within a family, others are solely due to genetic mutations passed down through generations. This problem is especially prevalent in Saudi Arabia—where rates of familial cancer are among the highest in the world.
“Cancer increased in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia by 136% between 1999 and 2015 [4].”
Approximately 20% of all Saudi Arabian cancer patients have a family history of cancer. This population is likely to carry mutant alleles, presenting an opportunity for further exploration and research. By studying these individuals and their genetic profiles, scientists and healthcare professionals can gain valuable insights into the genetic factors contributing to familial cancer in the Saudi Arabian population. This knowledge can help improve risk assessment, develop targeted prevention strategies, and potentially lead to more effective treatments for familial cancer cases.
The researchers used a 30-gene, targeted NGS panel to screen 310 subjects, including 57 non-cancer patients, 110 index patients with cancer and 143 of their relatives, 16 of whom also had cancer. (“Index patients” refers to individuals who are the first in a family to be diagnosed with a particular disease or condition of interest.) The NGS panel covered genes related to breast, ovarian, colorectal, endometrial, gastric, pancreatic, prostate, thyroid, renal, and skin cancers, as well as familiar adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and Lynch syndrome.
“This kit has been previously trialed as a means of capturing potential PVs [pathogenic variants] at a population level in Nigeria and the Caribbean, and in identifying rare variants in cancer patients who have tested negative for common cancer variants [35–38].”
The results showed that 119 subjects (38.4% of the cohort) carried pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (PVs) affecting genes associated with hereditary cancer risk. (TP53, ATM, CHEK2, CDH1, CDKN2A, BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, BRIP1, RAD51D, APC, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, PTEN, NBN/NBS1, and MUTYH were identified as genes with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants.) Among 126 patients and relatives with a history of cancer, 49 subjects (38.9%) carried pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants. Two specific variants (APC c.3920T>A and TP53 c.868C>T) were significantly associated with the occurrence of colorectal cancer/Lynch syndrome and multiple colon polyposis. Diverse variants in BRCA2, many of which were previously unreported as pathogenic, were found at a higher frequency in individuals with a history of cancer compared to the general patient population. Overall, these subjects had more genetic variants associated with familial cancers compared to other populations.
Conclusion
“In conclusion, this study is one of the first to report the prevalence of inherited cancer genetic variants in a cohort from the Arab world. Our study gives critical first insights into the genetic variants associated with overall cancer risk in this specific population, and specific forms including CRC/Lynch syndrome and breast cancer.”
The researchers concluded that their study was the first to use a comprehensive NGS panel for FCS risk assessment in Saudi Arabia and that it provided valuable insights into the genetic landscape of cancer in this population. They also acknowledged some limitations of their study, such as the small sample size, the lack of clinical data for some subjects and the possibility of false negatives due to technical or analytical issues. Overall, this study highlighted the importance of genetic testing and counseling for FCS in Saudi Arabia, where consanguineous marriages are common and may increase the risk of inheriting cancer-associated alleles from both parents. These findings also suggested that knowing the genetic profile of patients and their families could help tailor preventive strategies and treatments according to their specific risks.
“Whilst a larger population level study is still needed, we demonstrate that multigene NGS panel testing may serve as non-invasive diagnostic and cost-effective tool to predict familial cancer risk at the pre-clinical stage, allowing targeted screening and enabling early intervention.”
Click here to read the full research paper in Oncotarget.
Oncotarget is an open-access, peer-reviewed journal that has published primarily oncology-focused research papers since 2010. These papers are available to readers (at no cost and free of subscription barriers) in a continuous publishing format at Oncotarget.com. Oncotarget is indexed/archived on MEDLINE / PMC / PubMed.
Click here to subscribe to Oncotarget publication updates.
In a new study, researchers investigated the creatine shuttle pathway as a potential therapeutic target in colorectal cancer cells.
Listen to an audio version of this article
Since the 1992 Barcelona Olympics, creatine supplementation has increased in popularity and grown to widespread use among the mainstream public. Creatine is a naturally occurring compound, primarily stored in skeletal muscle and involved in energy production for high-intensity activities—enhancing performance and supporting muscle growth and strength. The process by which creatine is transported into the muscles and utilized for energy production is referred to as the creatine shuttle. While it is a useful mechanism for healthy muscles, the creatine shuttle has also been implicated in cancer.
“The creatine shuttle is highlighted in cancer as a source of energy for cancer cells that display aggressive proliferation, and aberrant creatine kinase (CK) levels are known to be associated with many malignancies and mitotic control [7].”
In a new study, researchers Mayu Kita, Rina Fujiwara-Tani, Shingo Kishi, Shiori Mori, Hitoshi Ohmori, Chie Nakashima, Kei Goto, Takamitsu Sasaki, Kiyomu Fujii, Isao Kawahara, Ujjal Kumar Bhawal, Yi Luo, and Hiroki Kuniyasu from Nara Medical University, Saveetha University and Nantong University hypothesized that the creatine shuttle is involved in energy metabolism and other adenosine triphosphate (ATP) supply in cancer cells. On May 19, 2023, their new research paper was published in Oncotarget’s Volume 14, entitled, “Role of creatine shuttle in colorectal cancer cells.”
“In the current study, the role of the creatine shuttle in CRC [colorectal cancer] was analyzed along with its potential as a therapeutic target.”
The Creatine Shuttle in Colorectal Cancer
Despite advancements in treatment options for colorectal cancer (CRC), incidence and mortality rates remain high. The metabolism of CRC cells is distinctly different from that of normal cells, and understanding these metabolic alterations is crucial for devising new targeted therapies. The creatine shuttle system plays a pivotal role in cellular energy metabolism, particularly in high-energy demanding tissues such as muscle and brain. However, its involvement in CRC cells has remained largely unexplored until now.
Creatine kinase, also known as CK or creatine phosphokinase, is an enzyme that catalyzes the transfer of a phosphate group from creatine phosphate to adenosine diphosphate (ADP), thereby regenerating adenosine triphosphate (ATP), which is the primary energy source for cells. CK exists in different forms or isoenzymes. In this study, the researchers investigated the expression and role of creatine kinase B (CKB) and mitochondrial creatine kinase (MTCK) in CRC tissues. They also explored the inhibitory effect of dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) on CKB and MTCK activity and its impact on CRC cell growth, stemness, mitochondrial function, energy metabolism, and cancer metastasis.
Inhibition of the Creatine Shuttle
The team used tissue arrays to examine CKB and MTCK expression in CRC tissues. Both proteins were highly expressed in high-grade tumors and cases with distant metastasis. Liver metastases showed higher expression compared to primary tumors, suggesting a role in CRC progression and metastasis.
DNFB, an inhibitor of CK activity, reduced CK activity and inhibited cell growth in CT26 and HT29 CRC cell lines. HT29 cells, with higher CKB and MTCK levels, were less sensitive to DNFB than CT26 cells. DNFB treatment decreased cell number, stem cell marker expression and impaired sphere formation in CT26 and HT29 cells. Knockdown of CKB or MTCK showed similar effects, indicating specificity to CK inhibition. DNFB also inhibited mitochondrial function and energy metabolism, decreasing mitochondrial membrane potential, increasing ROS production, and reducing OCR and ATP production in both cell lines.
In a mouse model of peritoneal dissemination, pretreatment with DNFB reduced tumor growth. Excised tumors from DNFB-treated mice showed decreased proliferation and stem cell marker expression, as well as reduced phosphorylation levels of tumor-promoting signaling molecules (EGFR, AKT, and ERK1/2).
Summary & Conclusion
“In this study, we showed that inhibition of the creatine shuttle by blocking CKB and MTCK activity suppressed the growth, stemness, and metastasis of cancer. It was suggested that the cause of this is related to inhibition of both mitochondrial energy metabolism and the phosphorylation signaling system.”
This research study provides valuable insights into the role of CKB and MTCK in CRC and highlights the therapeutic potential of inhibiting the creatine shuttle in CRC treatment. Inhibition of CKB and MTCK activity by DNFB impaired CRC cell growth, stemness, mitochondrial function, energy metabolism, and cancer metastasis. These findings suggest that targeting the creatine shuttle pathway may represent a promising therapeutic strategy for CRC patients. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings and explore the potential of targeting the creatine shuttle in clinical settings.
“Our data suggest that the antitumor effect of creatine shuttle inhibition can be attributed to the inhibition of mitochondrial energy production as well as the inhibition of multiple phosphorylation signals through inhibition of the ATP supply. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a new CK inhibitor to induce these two effects in vivo.”
Click here to read the full research paper in Oncotarget.
Oncotarget is an open-access, peer-reviewed journal that has published primarily oncology-focused research papers since 2010. These papers are available to readers (at no cost and free of subscription barriers) in a continuous publishing format at Oncotarget.com. Oncotarget is indexed/archived on MEDLINE / PMC / PubMed.
Click here to subscribe to Oncotarget publication updates.
